Tab Application Banner
  • Users Online: 237
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 11  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 177

Comments on: Role of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of asymmetric undifferentiated hand arthritis


Department of Medicine, The Sarvajanik Medical Trust Hospital, Rampura, Chhada-ole, Surat, Gujarat, India

Date of Web Publication11-Aug-2016

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Ankur Dalal
The Sarvajanik Medical Trust Hospital, Rampura, Chhada-ole, Surat - 395 003, Gujarat
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0973-3698.187424

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Dalal A. Comments on: Role of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of asymmetric undifferentiated hand arthritis. Indian J Rheumatol 2016;11:177

How to cite this URL:
Dalal A. Comments on: Role of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of asymmetric undifferentiated hand arthritis. Indian J Rheumatol [serial online] 2016 [cited 2019 Aug 23];11:177. Available from: http://www.indianjrheumatol.com/text.asp?2016/11/3/177/187424

Dear Editor,

I have read the article titled, "Role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of asymmetric undifferentiated hand arthritis" written by Paruchuri et al. [1] with great interest. The authors suggest that the addition of MR-based joint area involvement (clinically normal) may enhance the performance of the American College of Rheumatology/European League against Rheumatism (ACR/EULAR) 2010 rheumatoid arthritis (RA) criteria. The recommendation is interesting, but still I would like to take an opportunity to comment one or two points here.

First of all, the ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria is a tool that aids in classifying patients as RA, thus enabling early initiation of disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy. [2] If a patient is not fulfilling the criteria which mean that score is < 6, he/she will be classified as having undifferentiated arthritis (UA). In such scenario, we can more accurately predict the outcome of initial UA by integrating clinical and laboratory findings within the Leiden early arthritis clinic rule at the bedside. Low scores can be used to identify patients at very low risk of progression, and they can be spared from DMARD (immunosuppressive) therapy while higher scores identify patients who are very likely to require DMARD therapy. [3],[4] This was not observed by Paruchuri et al.; means while revising initial diagnosis of UA to MRI_RA or MRI_PRA how many patients were in the group of the high risk of progression as per Leiden early arthritis clinic rule requiring DMARDs, which was the ultimate goal of the study. I felt that this will be more informative.

Second, similar to other imaging methods such as radiography, CT, and MRI, ultrasound (US) also has a role in the diagnosis of musculoskeletal disorders. Moreover, Musculoskeletal (MSK) US is estimated to be less expensive, more patient friendly, being a dynamic study and having portability than MRI. [5] Hence, if the same group of patients was also evaluated with MSK US and then results were compared with MRI, it will be more informative because in developing country like India MRI is still not easily and economically available.

In conclusion; though the suggestion made by Paruchuri et al are interesting, if they had also compared their findings with a clinical tool and MSK US as I have discussed above then the conclusion made by them would have been more worthwhile for clinical practice.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Paruchuri RK, Rajasekhar L, Ressdy VS. Role of MRI in evaluation of asymmetric undifferentiated hand arthritis. Ind J Rheumatol 2016;11:60-61.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, Funovits J, Felson DT, Bingham CO 3 rd , et al. 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: An American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum 2010;62:2569-81.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
van der Helm-van Mil AH, le Cessie S, van Dongen H, Breedveld FC, Toes RE, Huizinga TW. A prediction rule for disease outcome in patients with recent-onset undifferentiated arthritis: How to guide individual treatment decisions. Arthritis Rheum 2007;56:433-40.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Pile K. Treatment of early undifferentiated arthritis. Indian J Rheumatol 2012;7:215-20.  Back to cited text no. 4
  Medknow Journal  
5.
Lento PH, Primack S. Advances and utility of diagnostic ultrasound in musculoskeletal medicine. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2008;1:24-31.  Back to cited text no. 5
    




 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed744    
    Printed22    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded53    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]