• Users Online: 90
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 11  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 156-162

Nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in pregnancy


Department of Clinical Immunology, JIPMER, Puducherry, India

Date of Web Publication22-Nov-2016

Correspondence Address:
Durga Prasanna Misra
Department of Clinical Immunology, JIPMER, Puducherry - 605 006
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0973-3698.194551

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Rheumatic disease often affects young females and males in the reproductive age group. Management of these diseases with immunosuppressive disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) is fraught with potential risks for the developing fetus as well as adverse pregnancy outcomes. In developing countries like India, most patients are treated with conventional DMARDs. We reviewed recent literature on safety during pregnancy for conventional disease-modifying agents, in view of the recently published landmark guidelines of the British Society for Rheumatology and the European League against Rheumatism. Exposure to leflunomide and cyclophosphamide is contraindicated in mothers during pregnancy and preconception phase, and fathers during conception due to risks for the developing fetus. Maternal exposure to methotrexate (MTX) during pregnancy or preconception confers higher risk of adverse pregnancy and fetal outcomes although paternal exposure may not be harmful. Sulfasalazine is safe during pregnancy; however, paternal exposure may reduce fertility, but this is reversible with cessation of the drug. Hydroxychloroquine, azathioprine, cyclosporine, and tacrolimus are compatible with maternal and paternal exposures without evidence for increased risk to the developing fetus. Insufficient data exist regarding safety profile of tofacitinib and apremilast during pregnancy. Rheumatologists should be cautious while starting these drugs in women and men of reproductive age group, and counsel patients accordingly to minimize the risk of adverse fetomaternal outcomes.

Keywords: Cyclophosphamide, leflunomide, methotrexate, mycophenolate mofetil, non-biologic DMARDs, pregnancy


How to cite this article:
Misra DP, Usdadiya JB, Negi VS. Nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in pregnancy. Indian J Rheumatol 2016;11, Suppl S2:156-62

How to cite this URL:
Misra DP, Usdadiya JB, Negi VS. Nonbiologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in pregnancy. Indian J Rheumatol [serial online] 2016 [cited 2017 Jul 23];11, Suppl S2:156-62. Available from: http://www.indianjrheumatol.com/text.asp?2016/11/6/156/194551


  Introduction Top


Many rheumatic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) are common in young females in the childbearing age. Management of these diseases in these patients represents a balancing act between the consequences of potential disease-related damage and the risk of infertility or adverse pregnancy outcomes when treated with potent immunosuppressive agents. Young males in the reproductive age group may also be affected with rheumatic diseases such as spondyloarthropathies and require disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Effect of these drugs on testicular function may result in impaired fertility, and excretion in the semen may adversely affect the fetus in the event of conception. Most patients in developing countries like India are treated with conventional DMARDs (cDMARDs) since financial considerations preclude the use of biologic DMARDs in a majority of the patients. Because it is difficult to conduct a randomized trial regarding pregnancy outcomes in patients exposed to DMARDs, most of the inferences regarding safety (or the lack thereof) are drawn from animal experiments and analyses of retrospective data (including databases of patients who have received these medications for solid organ transplantation or inflammatory bowel disease). Literature suggests that in spite of awareness of recommendations for DMARD use among rheumatologists and obstetricians, [1] a significant number of women continue to receive potentially dangerous teratogens during the first trimester of pregnancy (during which organogenesis occurs, and hence the developing fetus is at the greatest risk of congenital malformations) or the 3 months preceding it. [2] We shall review the literature on the use of cDMARDs, i.e., MTX, sulfasalazine (SSZ), leflunomide, hydroxychloroquine, azathioprine (AZA), mycophenolate, cyclosporine, tacrolimus, cyclophosphamide (CYC), tofacitinib, and apremilast in relation to pregnancy.


  Search Strategy Top


We searched MEDLINE and Google Scholar databases using the key words "pregnancy" in combination with each of "MTX," "SSZ," "leflunomide," "hydroxychloroquine," "AZA," "mycophenolate," "cyclosporine," "tacrolimus," "CYC," "tofacitinib" and "apremilast," for articles published from 2000 onward. Article titles and abstracts were read before deciding to include the articles in the review. In addition, the recently published landmark guidelines of the British Society for Rheumatology (BSR) [3] and the European League against Rheumatism [4] regarding the use of drugs in pregnancy in women with rheumatic diseases were also consulted. We shall present our findings individually for each drug, focusing on those drugs where the literature is controversial or suggests predominantly higher risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes with use of the drug.


  Hydroxychloroquine Top


Hydroxycholoroquine is a commonly used DMARD in patients with lupus, RA, and dermatomyositis. It is considered to be safe in pregnancy and is also compatible with paternal exposure at the time of conception. [3],[5]


  Methotrexate Top


MTX is commonly used in patients with RA, Sjogren's syndrome (SS), and lupus. MTX is considered a teratogenic drug. Studies in animals have demonstrated an embryotoxic effect and exposures in early pregnancy have been associated with the so-called MTX embryopathy, which includes growth retardation, cranial and skeletal abnormalities as well as neural crest defects including endocardial cushion defects such as tetralogy of Fallot. [6] It is recommended that it should be withdrawn at least 3 months before conception. [3] Accidental exposure to MTX in the last 3 months preconception or during the period of pregnancy requires to be treated with daily folic acid (5 mg) during pregnancy. [3] However, a lot of recent literature suggests that pregnancy outcomes in patients exposed to MTX during this period may not be uniformly bad [Table 1].
Table 1: Summary of recent studies on maternal and paternal exposure to methotrexate (MTX) and pregnancy outcomes

Click here to view


Brouwer et al. [7] analyzed prospectively collected data from the Netherlands and reported no significant increase in time to attaining pregnancy in women with RA treated previously with MTX. Vinet et al. [8] reported a lower rate of induced abortions in women receiving MTX compared to those not exposed to MTX in the 16 weeks before abortion (odds ratio: [OR] 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25-0.89), in their analysis of a Canadian database of 18,654 women with RA. While this might seem reassuring, it must be interpreted in the context of the alternative explanation of potentially increased spontaneous abortions in the subgroup of patients with RA receiving MTX. Weber-Schoendorfer et al. [9] analyzed a trans-Atlantic database incorporating data on pregnancies for patients with RA exposed to MTX (324, of whom 136 were exposed preconception and 188 were exposed postconception), other autoimmune diseases not exposed to MTX (disease controls, n = 459) and unexposed healthy controls (n = 1107). The preconception cohort did not show a significantly higher incidence of spontaneous abortions or major birth defects to either disease controls or healthy controls. However, the postconception cohort had a higher risk of spontaneous abortions (adjusted heart rate: 2.1, 95% CI: 1.3-3.2 compared to disease controls) as well as major birth defects (OR: 3.1, 95% CI: 1.03-9.5 compared with healthy controls; the adjusted OR for comparison with disease controls was not significant [OR: 1.8, 95% CI: 0.6-5.7]). Cooper et al. [5] reported the outcomes of 608 pregnancies from a database of patients from California. 402 of these fetuses had exposure to immunosuppressive agents, including MTX, during the first trimester, and 5.2% of them developed major congenital malformations compared to 2.3% of those fetuses (n = 171) who had not been exposed to immunosuppressants during the first trimester of pregnancy. Overall, there were 10 fetal deaths, 113 preterm deliveries, and 485 term deliveries. Exposure to MTX, hydroxychloroquine, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, or other immunosuppressants (taken together) was not associated with significant relative risk (RR) of adverse fetal outcomes (congenital malformations, fetal death, or neonatal complications resulting from either a term or a per-term delivery). However, caution must be exercised in drawing conclusions about the safety of MTX exposure in pregnancy in view of the small number of patients (n = 23), variable duration of exposure, as well as wide CIs for the RRs described in the study. Viktil et al. [10] analyzed pregnancy outcomes retrospectively from a Norwegian database of 154,976 pregnancies, of whom 1461 had received DMARDs. Eight women had received MTX (including seven in the preconception period and two in the first trimester), and fifty fathers had been dispensed MTX in the preconception period. Whereas none of the maternal exposures resulted in congenital malformation, two of the children sired by fathers exposed to MTX had orofacial abnormalities. In contrast, Weber-Schoendorfer et al., [11] in a retrospective analysis of a German database, found no increase in adverse outcomes (spontaneous abortions, stillbirths, all birth defects, major birth defects, or chromosomal abnormalities) resulting from paternal exposures to MTX in the preconception period (n = 113) compared with 412 pregnancies, in which the partner had not been exposed to MTX. However, paternal exposure to MTX was associated with a higher incidence of preterm deliveries. Similar findings were reported by Wallenius et al. [12] in their retrospective analysis of a Norwegian database. They found no increase in adverse pregnancy outcomes or fetal malformations in the 110 fathers exposed to DMARDs preconception (including 49 of whom who received MTX) compared to 230 fathers not exposed to MTX. On the basis of available literature, the BSR guidelines cautiously suggested that paternal exposure to MTX may not be associated with adverse fetal outcomes. [3]


  Sulfasalazine Top


SSZ is considered to be safe during pregnancy, when taken along with daily folate supplementation of 5 mg daily. [3] In rats exposed to SSZ, decreased expression of CD59 and decay accelerating factor in the epididymis [13] and increased oxidative stress in the testes and epididymis [14] have been found to contribute toward impaired sperm maturation and functional defect in the form of diminished acrosomal reaction. In patients with inflammatory bowel disease, paternal exposure to SSZ has been associated with abnormal sperm morphology and low sperm counts in seminal fluid, associated with reduction in serum testosterone levels and higher levels of luteinizing hormone compared to healthy controls. [15] Reduced fertility associated with the use of SSZ in men is considered reversible 3 months after stopping therapy. Infertility is not common and it may not be necessary to stop SSZ unless infertility of 12 months duration or more is observed. [3]


  Leflunomide Top


Leflunomide is a DMARD commonly used in RA and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). It has been proven to be teratogenic in animal models. Mice exposed to leflunomide during the period of organogenesis have been shown to develop limb abnormalities, cranial and skeletal malformations, and cardiac defects. [16] Exposure to leflunomide is associated with decreased mitosis of mesenchymal stem cells in the limb bud in these animal models. [17]

Two reports from the Organization of Teratology Information Specialists (OTIS) research group have further explored the risk of teratogenicity of leflunomide in a prospective cohort of patients from North America. The first study [18] compared outcomes in 64 women exposed to leflunomide in the first trimester of pregnancy with 108 disease controls (women with RA or juvenile idiopathic arthritis not exposed to leflunomide or any other known teratogenic agent during pregnancy) and 78 healthy controls. More than 95% of the mothers exposed to leflunomide had received cholestyramine washout. Although children born by patients on leflunomide had lower gestational age and lower birth weight and were more likely to be born by cesarean section, there were no significant increases in preterm delivery, low birth weight, nor was there any increase in major or minor congenital malformations. The second study from this group [19] compared outcomes in 29 mothers exposed to leflunomide before conception and 16 mothers who had received leflunomide during the first trimester of pregnancy. About three-fourth of these women had undergone leflunomide washout after the detection of pregnancy. The women who had received leflunomide during pregnancy had a higher incidence of preterm delivery, and two of them reported major congenital abnormalities (one with aplasia cutis of thighs, the other with multiple skeletal, craniofacial, and cardiac anomalies). A retrospective analysis of a large Norwegian database [10] analyzed three mothers who had been exposed to leflunomide (one preconception, two during pregnancy) and one father exposed to leflunomide during the time of conception. None of these exposures resulted in congenital malformations. Another analysis from this same database [12] reported no adverse outcomes in fathers exposed to DMARDs during conception, a minority of whom had received leflunomide. While this may suggest that exposure to leflunomide in the preconception period may be compatible with a normal or near-normal pregnancy and fetal outcome in the majority, it is strongly recommended to stop at least 3 months before trying for a baby in women and to have a cholestyramine washout unless deferring pregnancy for at least 2 years. Accidental exposure during pregnancy should also be washed out with cholestyramine until the plasma levels of leflunomide are undetectable. Such precautions may not be needed in fathers planning a family. [3]


  Azathioprine Top


AZA is a DMARD often used in lupus and systemic vasculitis. It is considered safe during pregnancy when used at doses ≤2 mg/kg/day and is not contraindicated in the father at the time of conception. [3] Saavedra et al. [20] retrospectively analyzed pregnancy outcomes in 178 females (87 exposed to AZA during pregnancy, 91 not exposed) and found no difference with respect to pregnancy outcomes or congenital anomalies. Recent retrospective analyses of patients with lupus nephritis have confirmed no increase in adverse pregnancy outcomes or disease flares after switching treatment from mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) to AZA before conception. [21],[22]


  Mycophenolate Mofetil Top


MMF is used as an induction agent in lupus and as a maintenance agent in patients with lupus and vasculitis. Animal studies have shown teratogenic effects resulting from intake of MMF during early pregnancy, with hydrocephalus, anophthalmia, cardiac abnormalities, and renal abnormalities being described in these mice. Much of the teratogenic effects of MMF in humans have been reported from solid organ transplant patients. Hoeltzenbein et al. [23] prospectively analyzed an European database to identify 57 mothers exposed to MMF during pregnancy, with resultant 16 spontaneous abortions, 12 induced abortions, and 29 live childbirths. Six of these 29 neonates had major congenital abnormalities, including external auditory canal atresia, tracheoesophageal atresia, myelomeningocele, hydronephrosis, and cardiac septal defects. Sifontis et al. [24] analyzed data from the National Transplantation Pregnancy Registry (USA) and reported outcomes in 33 pregnancies exposed to MMF. There were 15 spontaneous abortions (45%); four out of the remaining 18 live births had major congenital malformations, including skeletal abnormalities, microtia, cleft lip, and cleft palate. In view of the significant risk of the adverse fetal outcome in pregnant women exposed to MMF, it is recommended that MMF should be stopped at least 6 weeks before attempting conception and during pregnancy. [3] Jones et al. [25] analyzed 205 pregnancies fathered by 152 transplant recipients exposed to mycophenolic acid from the National Transplantation Pregnancy Registry and found no increase in adverse pregnancy outcomes compared to the general population. Hence, the BSR guidelines suggest that exposure to MMF in the father may be compatible with a normal pregnancy. [3]


  Calcineurin Inhibitors Top


Cyclosporine and tacrolimus are used as induction and maintenance agents in lupus nephritis. Literature on the use of these drugs during pregnancy has been drawn mostly from experiences in solid organ transplantation, [26] and they are considered compatible with pregnancy as well as for paternal exposure. [3] However, the careful monitoring will be required during a pregnancy in a woman taking these drugs. [3]


  Cyclophosphamide Top


CYC is used as a first-line agent for the induction of remission in lupus nephritis and primary systemic vasculitis. Exposure to CYC can result in teratogenicity [27] as well as gonadal failure, which needs to be kept in mind while prescribing in young patients (both females and males). A 3-fold greater risk of gonadal failure has been described in women older than 24 years receiving CYC compared to younger women [28] although other studies have suggested that the risk is greatest in those aged 30 years or more. However, should patients receiving CYC not experience gonadal failure; they can have successful pregnancies in the future. Croft et al. [29] reported 13 pregnancies in 11 women who had been treated with CYC (median cumulative dose 6 g) for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody vasculitis who had successful pregnancy outcomes. Two of them required the aid of assistive reproduction technologies, whereas the remaining eleven conceived spontaneously. All pregnancies continued till term, and all neonates born were morphologically normal. Alarfaj and Khalil [30] retrospectively reviewed data on pregnancies in a large cohort of patients with SLE who had received CYC. They reported older age of exposure, higher cumulative dose and duration of CYC, and more number of cycles of CYC as risk factors for amenorrhea. Women who could not conceive after receiving CYC had received a higher cumulative dose (mean 8.3 g vs. 6.7 gram) and were exposed to CYC at an older age (mean 34 years vs. 28 years) compared to those who were able to conceive after therapy with CYC. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the older age of therapy with CYC was a risk factor for inability to conceive after CYC exposure (RR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.03-1.32). They also compared pregnancy outcomes in patients with lupus who had received CYC compared to those who had not and found that although the frequency of preterm deliveries was higher in patients receiving CYC, they did not differ with respect to the proportions of live births or neonates with intrauterine growth retardation. A recently published analysis of 10,938 cancer survivors [31] from the USA concluded that cumulative doses of CYC ≥11295 mg/m 2 in females and ≥7412 mg/m 2 in males conferred higher risk of infertility. Hence, it is recommended that CYC should be used during pregnancy only in life-threatening or severe disease and parental exposure should be avoided if possible. [3] Strategies such as administration of gonadotropin analogs to induce temporary cessation of menstrual cycles during the administration of CYC have reported mixed results. [28] Somers et al. [32] studied the development of premature ovarian failure in patients with lupus requiring CYC therapy treated with monthly gonadotrophin analog compared with a control group of lupus patients not receiving this treatment along with CYC. They found that the only one out of the twenty patients receiving gonadotrophin analog developed premature ovarian failure, in comparison to six out of twenty patients in the control group. The alternative method of oocyte storage before CYC therapy presents challenges in patients with lupus, including the risk of lupus flares during ovarian stimulation. [33] Hence, the use of gonadotropin analogs may be a reasonable alternative approach toward maintaining ovulation in these patients. [33] Male patients who want to increase chances of fathering a child in the future should consider sperm banking before exposure to CYC. [28]


  Tofacitinib Top


Tofacitinib, an oral janus kinase inhibitor, has recently garnered evidence for use in RA and PsA. A recent paper analyzed data regarding maternal and paternal exposures to tofacitinib from the clinical trials database of Pfizer and the OTIS registry. [34] Forty-six maternal exposures to tofacitinib (13 in combination with MTX) were reported. Six were lost to follow-up, 25 had normal pregnancy outcomes, eight had induced abortions, seven spontaneous abortions, and one child had congenital pulmonary stenosis. Of the 44 fathers exposed to tofacitinib (one in combination with MTX), outcomes were reported in 28 pregnancies (23 normal deliveries with healthy neonates, five spontaneous abortions). It was concluded that insufficient data exist regarding the use of tofacitinib in pregnancy to draw definite conclusions.


  Apremilast Top


Apremilast is an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor used in PsA and Behcet's disease and undergoing trials in other inflammatory arthritides. [35] We could not find data regarding the use of apremilast in pregnant women, and this requires exploration as more information becomes available regarding the use of this drug.


  Conclusion Top


MTX and leflunomide may be associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes due to maternal exposure. There is less evidence of adverse outcomes with paternal exposure, but these drugs are best avoided before conception in women and men wanting to have children and during pregnancy. Mycophenolate is clearly associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes with maternal but to date not paternal exposures. CYC confers high risk of infertility in both males and females, which is associated with cumulative dose and age at exposure and is associated with teratogenicity during in-utero exposure. SSZ is safe during pregnancy, but is associated with reversible male infertility due to its effects on sperm maturation. Hydroxychloroquine, AZA, cyclosporine and tacrolimus are compatible with pregnancy. Insufficient literature exists regarding use of tofacitinib and apremilast in pregnancy. Clinicians must be cautious while prescribing these drugs to males and females in the reproductive age group to minimize the risk of adverse pregnancy and fetal outcomes.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
  References Top

1.
Panchal S, Khare M, Moorthy A, Samanta A. Catch me if you can: A national survey of rheumatologists and obstetricians on the use of DMARDs during pregnancy. Rheumatol Int 2013;33:347-53.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Viktil KK, Engeland A, Furu K. Use of antirheumatic drugs in mothers and fathers before and during pregnancy-a population-based cohort study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2009;18:737-42.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Flint J, Panchal S, Hurrell A, van de Venne M, Gayed M, Schreiber K, et al. BSR and BHPR guideline on prescribing drugs in pregnancy and breastfeeding - Part I: Standard and biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and corticosteroids. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2016;55:1693-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Götestam Skorpen C, Hoeltzenbein M, Tincani A, Fischer-Betz R, Elefant E, Chambers C, et al. The EULAR points to consider for use of antirheumatic drugs before pregnancy, and during pregnancy and lactation. Ann Rheum Dis 2016;75:795-810.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Cooper WO, Cheetham TC, Li DK, Stein CM, Callahan ST, Morgan TM, et al. Brief report: Risk of adverse fetal outcomes associated with immunosuppressive medications for chronic immune-mediated diseases in pregnancy. Arthritis Rheumatol 2014;66:444-50.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Hyoun SC, Obican SG, Scialli AR. Teratogen update: Methotrexate. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2012;94:187-207.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Brouwer J, Hazes JM, Laven JS, Dolhain RJ. Fertility in women with rheumatoid arthritis: Influence of disease activity and medication. Ann Rheum Dis 2015;74:1836-41.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Vinet É, Kuriya B, Pineau CA, Clarke AE, Bernatsky S. Induced abortions in women with rheumatoid arthritis receiving methotrexate. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2013;65:1365-9.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Weber-Schoendorfer C, Chambers C, Wacker E, Beghin D, Bernard N; Network of French Pharmacovigilance Centers, Shechtman S, et al. Pregnancy outcome after methotrexate treatment for rheumatic disease prior to or during early pregnancy: A prospective multicenter cohort study. Arthritis Rheumatol 2014;66:1101-10.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Viktil KK, Engeland A, Furu K. Outcomes after anti-rheumatic drug use before and during pregnancy: A cohort study among 150,000 pregnant women and expectant fathers. Scand J Rheumatol 2012;41:196-201.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Weber-Schoendorfer C, Hoeltzenbein M, Wacker E, Meister R, Schaefer C. No evidence for an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcome after paternal low-dose methotrexate: An observational cohort study. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2014;53:757-63.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Wallenius M, Lie E, Daltveit AK, Salvesen KÅ, Skomsvoll JF, Kalstad S, et al. No excess risks in offspring with paternal preconception exposure to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Arthritis Rheumatol 2015;67:296-301.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Fukushima T, Hamada Y, Komiyama M, Matsuno Y, Mori C, Horii I. Early changes in sperm motility, acrosome reaction, and gene expression of reproductive organs in rats treated with sulfasalazine. Reprod Toxicol 2007;23:153-7.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Alonso V, Linares V, Bellés M, Albina ML, Sirvent JJ, Domingo JL, et al. Sulfasalazine induced oxidative stress: A possible mechanism of male infertility. Reprod Toxicol 2009;27:35-40.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Ragni G, Bianchi Porro G, Ruspa M, Barattini G, Lombardi C, Petrillo M. Abnormal semen quality and low serum testosterone in men with inflammatory bowel disease treated for a long time with sulfasalazine. Andrologia 1984;16:162-7.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Fukushima R, Kanamori S, Hirashiba M, Hishikawa A, Muranaka R, Kaneto M, et al. Critical periods for the teratogenicity of immune-suppressant leflunomide in mice. Congenit Anom (Kyoto) 2009;49:20-6.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Fukushima R, Kaneto M, Kitagawa H. Microarray analysis of leflunomide-induced limb malformations in CD-1 mice. Reprod Toxicol 2010;29:42-8.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Chambers CD, Johnson DL, Robinson LK, Braddock SR, Xu R, Lopez-Jimenez J, et al. Birth outcomes in women who have taken leflunomide during pregnancy. Arthritis Rheum 2010;62:1494-503.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Cassina M, Johnson DL, Robinson LK, Braddock SR, Xu R, Jimenez JL, et al. Pregnancy outcome in women exposed to leflunomide before or during pregnancy. Arthritis Rheum 2012;64:2085-94.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Saavedra MÁ, Sánchez A, Morales S, Ángeles U, Jara LJ. Azathioprine during pregnancy in systemic lupus erythematosus patients is not associated with poor fetal outcome. Clin Rheumatol 2015;34:1211-6.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Al Maimouni H, Gladman DD, Ibañez D, Urowitz MB. Switching treatment between mycophenolate mofetil and azathioprine in lupus patients: Indications and outcomes. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2014;66:1905-9.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Fischer-Betz R, Specker C, Brinks R, Aringer M, Schneider M. Low risk of renal flares and negative outcomes in women with lupus nephritis conceiving after switching from mycophenolate mofetil to azathioprine. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2013;52:1070-6.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Hoeltzenbein M, Elefant E, Vial T, Finkel-Pekarsky V, Stephens S, Clementi M, et al. Teratogenicity of mycophenolate confirmed in a prospective study of the European Network of Teratology Information Services. Am J Med Genet A 2012;158A: 588-96.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Sifontis NM, Coscia LA, Constantinescu S, Lavelanet AF, Moritz MJ, Armenti VT. Pregnancy outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients with exposure to mycophenolate mofetil or sirolimus. Transplantation 2006;82:1698-702.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Jones A, Clary MJ, McDermott E, Coscia LA, Constantinescu S, Moritz MJ, et al. Outcomes of pregnancies fathered by solid-organ transplant recipients exposed to mycophenolic acid products. Prog Transplant 2013;23:153-7.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Westbrook RH, Yeoman AD, Agarwal K, Aluvihare V, O′Grady J, Heaton N, et al. Outcomes of pregnancy following liver transplantation: The King′s College Hospital experience. Liver Transpl 2015;21:1153-9.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Chernoff N, Rogers JM, Alles AJ, Zucker RM, Elstein KH, Massaro EJ, et al. Cell cycle alterations and cell death in cyclophosphamide teratogenesis. Teratog Carcinog Mutagen 1989;9:199-209.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Dooley MA, Nair R. Therapy insight: Preserving fertility in cyclophosphamide-treated patients with rheumatic disease. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol 2008;4:250-7.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Croft AP, Smith SW, Carr S, Youssouf S, Salama AD, Burns A, et al. Successful outcome of pregnancy in patients with anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody-associated small vessel vasculitis. Kidney Int 2015;87:807-11.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Alarfaj AS, Khalil N. Fertility, ovarian failure, and pregnancy outcome in SLE patients treated with intravenous cyclophosphamide in Saudi Arabia. Clin Rheumatol 2014;33:1731-6.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Chow EJ, Stratton KL, Leisenring WM, Oeffinger KC, Sklar CA, Donaldson SS, et al. Pregnancy after chemotherapy in male and female survivors of childhood cancer treated between 1970 and 1999: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study cohort. Lancet Oncol 2016;17:567-76.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Somers EC, Marder W, Christman GM, Ognenovski V, McCune WJ. Use of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone analog for protection against premature ovarian failure during cyclophosphamide therapy in women with severe lupus. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:2761-7.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Hickman RA, Gordon C. Causes and management of infertility in systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2011;50:1551-8.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Clowse ME, Feldman SR, Isaacs JD, Kimball AB, Strand V, Warren RB, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in the tofacitinib safety databases for rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis. Drug Saf 2016;39:755-62.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Poole RM, Ballantyne AD. Apremilast: First global approval. Drugs 2014;74:825-37.  Back to cited text no. 35
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Search Strategy
Hydroxychloroquine
Methotrexate
Sulfasalazine
Leflunomide
Azathioprine
Mycophenolate Mo...
Calcineurin Inhi...
Cyclophosphamide
Tofacitinib
Apremilast
Conclusion
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed557    
    Printed1    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded124    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]