ORIGINAL ARTICLE |
|
Year : 2007 | Volume
: 2
| Issue : 3 | Page : 91-94 |
|
CDAI (clinical disease activity index) in rheumatoid arthritis: cut-off values for classification into different grades of disease activity
V Arya1, AN Malaviya2, RR Raja2
1 Department of Medicine, JIPMER, Pondicherry, India 2 A&R Clinic for Arthritis and Rheumatism' and ISIC Superspecialty Hospital, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi, India
Correspondence Address:
A N Malaviya A&R Clinic for Arthritis and Rheumatism' and ISIC Superspecialty Hospital, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |

|
|
Background: CDAI is a composite index for quantifying disease activity in RA. It utilises 4 clinical parameters namely, swollen and tender joints out of 28 (the set designated for DAS28) and global assessment of the patient and assessor on a visual analogue scale. No laboratory parameter is needed.
Objective: To determine cut-off values for CDAI (clinical disease activity index) in Indian patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) for classification into different grades of disease activity.
Methods: CDAI and DAS28 (disease activity score on 28 joints) were measured at the first and again at the last clinic visit on 100 adult patients with RA seen over a period of 1½ years. Using recommended DAS28 values as a comparator for classifying patients into the following 4 categories of disease activity namely 'remission', 'low disease activity', 'moderate disease activity, and 'high disease activity', the corresponding CDAI cut-off values were derived statistically.
Results: Among Indian patients CDAI cut-off values for the classification of patients into 4 categories of disease activity were: remission ≤ 2.2, low disease activity > 2.2 to ≤ 5, moderate disease activity > 5 to ≤ 21 and high disease activity > 21.
Conclusions: CDAI, a simple tool that is based on clinical parameters alone, was applied to the Indian patients with RA. The cut-off values derived in this study by a standardised assessment methodology could be useful in routine monitoring and therapeutic decisions in RA. |
|
|
|
[PDF]* |
|
 |
|