Tab Application Banner
  • Users Online: 191
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2009  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 47-50

Assessment of serum nitrite as biomarker of disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis


1 Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, New Delhi, India
2 Department of Internal Medicine, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, India
3 Department of Rheumatology, Command Hospital, Lucknow, India
4 Department of Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Correspondence Address:
A Kumar
Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology Division, Department of Internal Medicine, New Delhi
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

Background: The assessment of disease activity in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) continues to be a chal- lenging issue. The currently available markers like C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) show poor correlation with clinical disease activity. There is a need for good biomarkers to assess disease activity. We explored serum nitrite, a stable end product of metabolism of NO, which is known to rise in inflammation, as a potential biomarker of disease activity in AS. Objectives: To compare the levels of serum nitrite between patients with AS and healthy controls and to correlate levels of serum nitrite with disease activity in four assessment in ankylosing spondylitis (ASAS) domains. Methods: Fifty patients satisfying modified New York criteria for AS were recruited for the study. Patients were assessed in the following ASAS domains: physical function (BASFI), pain (VAS, 0-100), patient global assessment (VAS, -100) and inflammation (mean of the two morning stiffness related BASDAI scores). Eighty-seven healthy controls were also included for comparison. Blood samples (12 hours fasting) were obtained and stored for serum nitrite level estimation, which was done by Ding's method. The median levels of serum nitrite were compared between the two groups. Correlation of serum nitrite levels was sought with individual domains of disease activity. Results: The median serum nitrite levels in patients with AS were markedly elevated as compared to those in con- trols (39 μmol/L [IQR 27-50] vs. 4.75 μmol/L [2.53-12], P = 0.001 (Mann-Whitney U test). There was only one patient whose serum nitrite level overlapped with that of controls. Clinical assessment of disease activity (individual ASAS domains-physical function (BASFI), pain, patient global assessment and inflammation (mean of the two morning stiffness) did not show a good correlation with serum nitrite levels. Conclusions: Serum nitrite level was increased eight folds in patients with AS when compared with controls. Thus its measurement holds promise in differentiating between inflammatory and mechanical low back pain. However, there was no variation across a range of levels of disease activity making it unsuitable as a biomarker to monitor disease activity in AS.


[PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed428    
    Printed11    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded40    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal