Tab Application Banner
  • Users Online: 7859
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 15  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 23-26

Introduction of mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise as a mode of assessment for postgraduate students in medicine for examination of sacroiliac joints

1 Department of Internal Medicine, AFMC, Pune, Maharashtra, India
2 Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, AFMC, Pune, Maharashtra, India

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Sonal Singh
Department of Internal Medicine, Armed Forces Medical College, Solapur Road, Pune - 411 040, Maharashtra
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.4103/injr.injr_106_19

Rights and Permissions

Background: Formative and subjective assessment of medical education is the need of the hour today. Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (mini-CEX) and Directly Observed Procedural Skills (DOPS) are the commonly used workplace-based assessment (WPBA) tools which have been extensively studied in both undergraduate and postgraduate (PG) settings. In this study, we tried to assess the feasibility of mini-CEX and also its acceptability among PG students of internal medicine and teaching faculty for the examination of sacroiliac joints. Methods: This is an interventional study which was carried out in a government medical college in Pune, Maharashtra, India, from January to June 2019. A total of 18 1st- and 2nd-year PG students and 9 teaching faculty from the department of internal medicine participated in this study. Each student underwent five mini-CEX evaluations over a period of 6 months under different teaching faculty. Feedback was taken from both the teaching faculty and students regarding the feasibility of mini-CEX as an assessment tool. Results: A total of ninety mini-CEX exposures involving 18 PG students and nine faculty were analyzed. We found a statistically significant improvement in the domain of medical interviewing (P < 0.001), physical examination (P = 0.003), professionalism (P = 0.001), clinical judgment (P = 0.003), counseling skills (P < 0.001), and organizing efficiency (P < 0.001). Overall clinical competence improved from a scale of 5 (1.7) to 6.7 (0.8). Conclusion: The results of this study show that overall mini-CEX is an acceptable and effective assessment tool. However, regular training of assessors through workshops on the provision of effective feedback is required. Modification of the assessment form based on the feedbacks provided by teachers and students will further facilitate the implementation of this teaching tool in the curriculum.

Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded131    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal